Friday, January 23, 2009

BHO is my new BFF!

It's still sinking in that we have a new president. The campaign went on so long that I got caught up in the process of electing a democrat (I first supported Richardson, then Obama) that I'd forgotten what that outcome actually means. I see Obama on TV and it's slowly sinking in that he's president now. I was talking about the gestation time between new episodes of Lost being so long, but it pales in comparison to this last presidential election cycle--it was, what, more than two years?

I keep seeing the little news blurbs on Yahoo! re: Obama and think, "boy, he's not wasting any time." Then my alter ego/evil twin says, "No, Stupidhead--he's had more than two bloody years to figure out what he was going to do as President!"

I know this is clearly the honeymoon period; I mean, the man has been president only a few days. But he's getting right down to it, isn't he? Today he signed an Executive Order that overturned the ban of giving federal money to international groups that perform abortions or provide abortion information. This will no doubt be controversial with some people, but it shows me that he's not going to shy away from these kind of controversial issues.

Of course, he's got to work on the E (Economy), but what would you like to see Obama do? These days, I'm all about another E: the environment. My ideas include:

  • bumping up (or initiating) tax credits or zero percent interest loans on people installing solar panels, wind turbines, solar-heated water tanks, or other clean energy appliance, or buying energy star appliances, such as an energy star refrigerator.
  • providing tax credits and/or zero percent financing on people buying hybrid, all electric, or natural-gas fueled vehicles (new or used!).
  • Increasing the luxury tax for those who continue to buy cars that don't meet a minimum MPG.
  • providing tax credits for those people who car pool or take public transporation to work (don't know how you can prove this, but BHO is a smart guy and he can figure it out!).
Of course, there can also be similiar incentives for businesses. And while I don't personally support a bailout of the auto industry, I am pragmatic enough to realize that they're going to get the loans they need.

But - let's put some tough conditions on the money, like producing more fuel efficient cars and not allowing their CEO's to spend over a million dollars redecorating their office, like the former CEO at Merrill Lynch (you can see why they needed that bailout). Even local "nonprofit" UPMC has the presence of mind to spend a more appropriate $65,000 or so for CEO Jeffrey Romoff's new office (although the new signs on USX Tower cost $750,000). I think other companies can show similar restraint...

4 comments:

  1. Boy they are stupid. Do they know the deals they can get with some legwork at Marshall's, Wal-mart, and a jaunt through the Strip District?
    Can you really blame them, though? They are the products of pampering and special treatment. It had all gone to their heads.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And let's not forget my two favorite venues, craigslist and the dollar store. Just got a brand new HP laser printer for $40 - sweeeet!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Another idea which could have a profound positive effect on the enivironment/global warming:

    1)have the feds set a base-level price for a gallon of refined gasoline--say $4. This is still far less than what most Europeans routinely pay for their petrol. This will (a)raise sorely needed capital for the tax cuts mentioned above (as well as money for the r&d needed to develop alternative green energy sources);(b)encourage conservation (ie, less driving); and (c) provide money for the development of better mass transit. It will also help to "deleverage" the political power of the oil industry in making policy at the federal level.

    btw, speaking of mass transit, did anyone see the latest story about the so-called "North Side Connector?" Apparently, cost overruns (supposedly mostly material costs) have pushed the price from about $314 million to about $425 million...and THERE IS NO MORE MONEY. So, the project will be shutting done...TOTALLY UNFINISHED (and just shutting the project down will itself cost another $20-25 million.)

    So, city, county, state, and federal taxpayers have spend over $300 million for a transit boondoggle WHICH WON"T EVEN FUNCTION. The amount of money spend could have funded normal PAT operations for years.

    What is perhaps most sickening is that this situation was predicted by opponents of the project in the first place. But, support from Luke, the Govenor, and certain elements on the City and County Councils made passage a foregone conclusion (sort of like gambling in Pittsburgh or funding for the new stadiums.)

    We need "sunshine" laws for local, county, and state government to ensure the security of taxpayer dollars (and an investigation needs to be undertaken by the City Comptroller's office to determine where the money went.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous: some really excellent points. It was clear $4 was the tipping point for most people that made them drive less and conserve fuel. My only concern is for poor people in rural communities that don't have mass transit. How could they afford $4/gallon gas?

    And v. disturbing news about our tunnel to nowhere. Cost overruns on a govt. project--who would've thunk it? They have some 'plaining to do, I agree--and they'd better figure out a way to get it finished.

    Julie

    ReplyDelete